It has been a year characterized by record high prices, record low inventory and wild swings in activity.
For the first time in history, the average price for Summit County properties climbed above $700,000 and stayed there for four consecutive months reaching nearly $800,000 in August. The July average price was 33 percent above the previous July. Yet September brought the average down by over 16 percent from August and many price reductions appeared.
Once again, for the entire year, the inventory remained at alarmingly low levels, beginning the year at about 500 properties for sale and never rising above 780 properties of all types for sale at one time. In 2017 the inventory peaked at about 900 properties. In contrast, 2010 saw over 3000 properties for sale in the depths of the Bush Depression.
On the morning of October 5 there were 64 residences priced under a half-million dollars for sale in Summit County. There were 233 properties priced under $1 million.
1073 properties priced under $1 million had sold to that date. See the problem here?
As a result, the average sale price is 98.9 percent of list this year and it is taking an average 71 days to sell and close a property.
It is concerning that the market is in its 4th year of stagnant sales. There will be another 2150 or so properties sold this year, still stuck in the same 2100 to 2200 sale range that began in 2015. This is partly because of the lack of inventory, but buyer resistance to current prices is becoming a factor.
Buyers who have been waiting months for availability in their preferred locations find that new listings are more expensive than when they began looking. And then they sell in days. Potential buyers are being discouraged by these prices.
Current owners aren’t selling because many want to move up to a larger or different type of property. Besides there being nothing available, even selling at the highest price in history for their property won’t pay for the replacement. So they are stuck.
The market is left with sellers who are buying elsewhere for less money, those whose lives have changed and don’t need a second home any longer or for whom selling makes economic sense in paying for college or retirement.
Rising interest rates have had some effect, but half of our market is cash sales. Interest rates affect mainly first time buyers and primary residents, a small part of the market. Rising prices have made that segment even smaller.
Record stock market levels have caused some investors to take money off the crap table and put it in real estate, hence the record number of $1 million plus sales. The average Summit County single family home is now worth over $1 million.
So we’ve got marginally more buyers than sellers, nothing for sale to speak of and prices at historic highs. The odds of all these factors remaining in place for very long are low.
At some point, a bunch of owners will decide to sell because of a stock market correction, recession or some change in the economic cycle and supply will equal or exceed demand for a while. When this happened in 2009, it took several years to recover to the previous price levels. The number of sales never did recover.
But through all of the cycles, the fundamental force that keeps our prices high is lack of private land in Summit County. The 15 percent of the County that is private is nearly all built. That’s why you see so many structures being demolished and new construction going up. It’s often the only way to build.
Cycles will come and go, but the basic value of Summit County real estate will remain, just as it has for all of my three-decade career.
When things look the most uncertain, back up and look at the big picture. Real estate is a long term investment and those who have planned well over the years, myself included, have profited greatly. This won’t change.
It has been a year characterized by record high prices, record low inventory and wild swings in activity.
There are some changes coming that will have a significant impact on property owners in Summit County, and every other tourist destination, in the future.
The rise of the VRBO and AIRB&B Internet property sharing industry is quickly forcing changes in law and regulation as well as in the established rental management industry.
All of the towns, the County and even individual homeowners associations in Summit County are writing or have already put into place restrictions and registration requirements on short-term rentals by owners.
A lot of this has been caused by the lack of supervision by absentee owners of their short-term renters now that local management companies are handling perhaps only half of the short-term properties they used to.
Regulations vary a lot but owners usually have to hire a local supervisor of some kind to control noise, parking, trash and other nuisances quickly. They will also increasingly be required to register short-termed properties with local government and buy a license to enable enforcement of these rules.
Many homeowners associations are limiting or halting short-term rentals. This has not impacted property values to any great degree so far because about half the second homes in Summit County are not rented. The impact will probably be limited in the future, especially since rentals can only defray some of the costs of ownership at present levels and are not needed by most second home owners to be able to afford the property.
Long-term rentals of six months or more are generally not being restricted except in two or three neighborhoods where occupancy even by the owner is limited to less than 12 months per year to prevent the properties from becoming de facto affordable full-time housing.
This is not just a Summit County thing. Most resort and tourism oriented areas in the US and other countries are feeling the impact of over-visitation and support among the permanent residents is building to restrict visitation to sustainable levels (think Venice Italy). As the world population has grown and approached economic parity with the First World (think China) tourism has become the largest sector of the global economy.
Watch for more restrictions like noise ordinances (Frisco) occupancy restrictions (certain HOA’s), and limitations on visitor numbers (Yellowstone, Kauai, etc.) attempting to keep things the way they used to be in the olden days. Good luck with that!
This is it folks… the last Real Estate Insider after 32 years of writing them. Those of you who have owned in Summit County for that long have received this newsletter over 120 times and have seen it grow from an ugly one page dot matrix printed black and white publication to the four page full color issues of recent years.
The content has not changed, however.
I’ve reported honestly and accurately on market trends through boom and bust periods alike. Tough times like the 1986 DOW panic (down over 200 points in one day!!), 9/11, the Dot.com bust, the Lehman melt down, and heady times like the first home sold for $1 million in Summit County, the 75% run-up in average price from 2004 to 2008, and from prices that averaged under $100,000 in the mid-80’s to nearly $700,000 toda
Since 1985 I’ve given you my best opinion of what was to come and advice on how to prepare for it. Many of you have thanked me over the years for that advice and have done very well because of it.
I’ve never resorted to puffery or hype to boost my business or our market. I learned early on that over promising doesn’t pay. This has not sat well with some buyers and sellers, but I’ve rarely been proven wrong. I’d rather be considered too conservative than to promise what can’t be delivered.
Sometime in the next few months I’ll be wrapping up my practice. Until then I’m still in the same full time business. I won’t become a part-time broker.
In my opinion, as I have indicated over the years in this newsletter, there is no such thing as a part-time broker. There’s a lot more to serving the public in the most complex and expensive transactions they’ll do in their lives than making a few phone calls from the couch and getting a big check.
When I stop taking listings and working with new buyers at some point in the next few months, I’ll turn my client base over to Jason Smith, owner of Colorado Real Estate Company.
I chose Jason because he’s established and works in a lot of the same neighborhoods that I’ve specialized in for the past few decades. A lot of you already know of him through his mailings. He’s got ten fewer years experience than I do, but has averaged the same number of transactions as I have per year.
Most importantly, he’s a serious full-time Realtor who takes care of his business in the same spirit that I have. I’ve found in my dealings with him over the years that he’s more about fairness and honesty than just getting the next deal done. Just like me, I don’t think he cares enough about the money to lie.
If you get to work with Jason, I think you’ll be just as impressed with him as I have been. I know you’ll be taken care of at the same high level as I have worked to do for all of these years. I’ll send you all his contact information when I get closer to the time.
I’m available until then, of course.
So after nearly 1100 transactions and after 32 years of being on three ring alert seven days a week, after well over a quarter-billion dollars in sales, soon I’ll take the rest of the day off.
I want to thank each and every one of you who have supported my practice for all these years. I wish you all well and many happy years of enjoyment of your place in Summit County.
First Quarter sales dropped slightly for the first time since 2012 from 391 last year to 358 this year. After the Lost Decade that began in 2009, first Quarter sales, and sales in general, have never recovered to the high point reached in 2006.
In 2006 first Quarter sales reached 543 properties and there were routinely around 3000 total sales per year in the mid-2000’s.
Last year 2258 properties sold in Summit County, 24 percent fewer than in 2006.
Prices, however, have been on a rampage increasing by over 15 percent last year alone, the largest one year increase since 2007. Lack of inventory has exacerbated the inflated prices.
Each new listing hits the market with perhaps 400 automatic notifications going out to buyers who have been waiting for new inventory. This has made multiple offers routine with outrageous terms like escalator clauses, huge down payments and waived due diligence.
Understandably, new buyers feel whipsawed by the quick action required and the prices and terms they need to match on the first couple of tries. Then they either decide this market is too crazy for them or they get aggressive.
More of them are choosing the first option and the number standing in line is diminishing. That is another reason sales have been flat for three years.
This is exactly the kind of market we saw in 2005, 2006 and 2007. Buyer frenzy for scarce inventory drove double digit price increases. Then came the Bush Depression of 2009 and by 2011 the average price had dropped by 20 percent and sales by more than half.
That was the first time ever that prices had declined by more than 5 percent and for more than one year in Summit County. There had been a couple of dislocations like 9/11 and the Dot.com bust that had caused soft prices for a year, but prices were essentially flat.
That has changed now. Although our society seems to have adjusted to chronic chaos and uncertainty, the overwhelming confidence that characterized the 25 year period from 1984 to 2009 is certainly gone.
Summit County is a luxury second home market and as such depends almost entirely on consumer confidence and growing disposable income. Economic uncertainty causes consumers to think twice about luxury purchases.
Because there are twice as many Americans as 50 years ago, there are also twice as many with the resources and confidence to buy second homes. But many are Boomers who have done so already. Our buyer market is now largely made up of those wishing to move up from the entry level properties and a lower number of affluent youngsters than during the Boomer years.
Those who have their place in the mountains are generally going to keep them now that their retirement plan is in place. So the immediate future is probably characterized by continued low inventory and fierce competition for it until the next economic cycle begins. That could be tomorrow or ten years from now.
Don’t get caught up in the frenzy just because everyone else is.
Buyers and sellers in this market should act based on their own desire to be here in the mountains, to enjoy the life here.
Get informed, but don’t try to outguess or overthink this.
Do what makes sense to satisfy your own needs and dreams then enjoy the results.
Trying to buy a property in Summit County? Here’s what to expect.
Since October of 2017, there have been the fewest number of properties for sale in history. The number of properties priced under $700,000 has hovered around 100 for six months. A thousand will be sold this year.
For the past six years, the inventory has declined steadily each year. In the first half of the year, we should have about 1500 properties of all types on the market. The inventory should peak at around 2000 properties in July. This year we have under 550 properties for sale and last July the peak was under 1000. This year it will probably be less than that.
Buyers for the lower half of the market have been waiting for the next property to be listed. Every active Realtor in Summit County has several buyers on automatic notification so that they know instantly when a new property appears. New listings routinely get four or five hundred notifications sent out.
A couple of dozen buyers respond, several travel to see the property in its first few days on the market and often a couple of those make an offer. Sometimes the offer comes from a buyer who has not seen the property but has their broker walk through for an iPhone video.
Usually an accurately priced property is gone in a day or two. Only the most unrealistically priced properties stay on the market longer than that. Even million dollar plus properties will sometimes sell in a few days, but that market segment remains oversupplied.
Buyers who have been through this process and lost out have begun to add an “escalator” clause to their next offer. In short, this tells the seller that the buyer will beat any other verifiable offer by a certain dollar amount, usually with a cap, sometimes not, typically resulting in a sale at more than the asking price.
So what does a buyer have to do to get an offer accepted? The best chance begins with a full price cash offer with the escalator. Every contingency or other out for the buyer lessens the odds of success. Buyers even waive inspections, appraisals and loan conditions.
Buyers who need a mortgage should put as much cash down as possible and have a pre-qualification letter in hand from a lender to go with the offer.
Personal letters to the seller from the buyer explaining why their offer should be accepted are common and sometimes result in the seller taking a lower offer for sentimental reasons.
The point is that buyers need to convince sellers to take their offer over another and it takes planning and strategy to get this done.
This will change when a normal inventory returns and it’s not such a brutal seller’s market. But for now, this is what it takes.
The short-term rental market is changing. Every year brings more regulation, more license fees and taxes and political pressure for fewer short term units and more long-term worker housing.
Three forces are driving these changes:
First, towns and counties can’t raise enough sales and property tax revenue to fund operations so they are turning to other taxes and license fees to bring in revenue. Because tourism is the largest part of our economy, lodging is the logical source for new revenue.
Towns are going as far as to pursue online travel companies for taxes on bookings at their sites and tracking down bandit landlords on social media and Craigslist.
Second, because half of second homes are never rented, many neighbors who don’t rent don’t want short-term renters next door. Short termed properties tend to bring more traffic, parking and noise issues among other things. Many homeowner associations are limiting rentals to several weeks or more.
And third, there is a continuing perception that somehow short-term rentals are stealing housing from locals. Never mind that instead of making owners rich, short-term rentals can only help defray the cost of a second home and a long term tenant rules out occasional owner use. Also, properties that are affordable for locals to buy are generally not good prospects for short-term rental.
In addition, because so many absentee owners rent through VRBO and AirB&B, towns and associations are starting to require a local manager to monitor the property. This and licensing helps governments keep track of who’s renting and helps them collect the lodging taxes.
There will never be enough local housing and tourism will only continue to grow. If your property isn’t subject to these changes yet, it will be sooner or later.
Ask questions about these issues if you are a prospective buyer and if you are an owner, pay attention to the news.
And beware of managers who project astronomical income from renting your property short-term.
Our main short-term rental season is from Thanksgiving to April 15 in the best of years, 150 days or less when rents are the highest for the year.
Summer rentals bring half as much.
If you use a manager, you’ll pay a hefty commission out of your gross income.
If you use your place at all for Christmas, New Year’s, MLK week, Presidents week and all of March you will cut into your best revenue period.
If you are dependant upon rental income to do more than defray some of your costs, you may not be ready for a second home.
from National Assoc. of Realtors Magazine January 2018 | By Bruce Ailion
If you are a second home owner or thinking of becoming one, you may want to talk to a lawyer about setting up a limited liability corporation or other legal entity and operating the second home as an LLC.
In case you are sued by someone using the property after you bought it, you can limit your damages and protect your personal assets against losses.
Suppose a contractor makes negligent repairs to a deck and it collapses while tenants and guests are having a barbecue. The judgment in a case like this could easily exceed the equity you have in the property and even the coverage limits on your insurance policy.
Or let’s say the carbon monoxide detector is faulty and the property has a 20-year-old furnace that develops cracks, releasing gas indoors. Tragically, a family of four staying in the property is killed. The owners could face four wrongful death actions caused by negligence.
These are rare occurrences, to be sure, but they point to the gravity of risks that investment property owners can face. In fact, the scenarios illustrate one of the main differences between real estate and other types of investments like stocks or bonds: real estate can carry risks that exceed the investment in the asset.
Of course, an owner’s first layer of protection is insurance, but owners might fail to recognize that their losses can exceed coverage limits.
Investing in real estate can be a smart decision. The right property can outperform other investment vehicles.
But it makes sense to have sufficient insurance and to consider setting up an LLC or other type of entity to separate your liability from your personal assets.
Frisco Bay is going to be deepened…. Can cruise ships be far behind? The project has no expected start date yet, but is in the planning stages. 75,000 cubic yards of dirt later, Carnival cruise lines will be able to pull right up to Main St. where colorful locals will weave baskets and hats for happy cruisers to take home. Steel drums, anyone?
Having won about half of the medals from the Korean Winter Olympics… residents of Silverthorne have changed the name of the town to Goldthorne. Doesn’t roll off the tongue like Goldenthorne would, but townies didn’t want to be confused with that other Golden down in the Front Range. Silverthorne must have the highest gold medal per capita number in the world right now.
Now if Lindsey Vonn (82 wins) and Mikaela Schiffrin (43 wins) would just move to Silverthorne… every other ski town could just give up. Well, they only live 30 miles away. We could just claim them. You know… East Vail, West Vail, Eagle/Vail, why not Silverthorne/Vail?
And the debate is on… should Colorado host a Winter Olympics? We turned them down once before and there are great arguments both for and against. Some think we should have them just to get I70 fixed properly. Good luck with that. Seems that Nordic events couldn’t be run in Summit County, though. Olympics big-wigs think it’s too high here. Wimps.
It surfaces every Spring so maybe we should change the name of mud season… the innovators at the Town of Breckenridge are considering DNA testing (Really!) to track scofflaws who don’t pick up after their dogs. Fill in your own joke here.
There was a time in my 32 year career when I thought I’d seen it all and could forecast what would happen next in our market.
I am not ashamed to say now that I have no idea what’s gonna happen next.
The best any of us can do in these circumstances is to be ready for anything.
So as Red Green down at the Possum Lodge used to say: “Remember, I’m pullin’ for ya. We’re all in this together.”
Call me any time and until then, keep your stick on the ice.
Chuck Leathers, CRS owner/broker
How to describe this ridiculous market?
On the first day of 2018, there were a total of 510 properties of any type for sale in Summit County. 182 of these were land, 304 were residences. 88 residences were priced under $700,000 and nothing priced less than $225,000 was for sale at all.
There was a six month supply of residences priced over $1 million and 3.5 weeks’ supply under $700,000. Residences priced over $1 million took an average 148 days to sell. Those on the market averaged 234 days since listed.
Residences priced under $1 million took 44 days to sell and those on the market had been offered for 120 days. Clearly the market had slowed by the end of the year.
So the market has been over-supplied with expensive homes and severely under supplied with lower priced ones.
This lack of inventory in the most sought-after segment of the market is largely responsible for the third flat year of sales in 2017.A total of 2250 properties sold in 2017, 6.8% more than the year before and only 3 percent higher than in 2015. There has been a net gain of less than 2 percent over the past three years in the total number of properties sold.
The average sale price jumped by 15 percent, however, to $650,500 – a new record by far for Summit County. The median price was $505,000, a substantial disconnect from the average and atypical for our market where median and average prices are usually very close.
Clearly all prices increased, but the high-end dragged the whole market skyward. The $million plus market now accounts for 14.5 percent of residential sales, up from about ten percent last year. As construction costs continue to increase, and because nearly all new construction is in high-end single family homes, the average price for a single family home is now well over $1.1 million.
While prices have recovered and surpassed the previous historic high in 2009, sales volume has not recovered from the Depression of 2010. It’s running about 33 percent below the all-time high of about 3000 properties sold in both 2005 and 2006.
The number of listings in July, when the inventory peaks every year, has declined for the past five years. The all-time high for listed properties was about 3000 in July of 2010. In 2017 it was 904. At this rate, there will be fewer than 800 properties of all types for sale next July.And chances are good that a third of those listed will still be land. Despite the lack of existing residences for sale, land has not kept pace with the total market. In fact the average price for 182 sales of vacant land fell to $327,300 in 2017, a decline of 4.5 percent.
This is partly because all the easy to build on lots in Summit County are gone. It is also because the homes built on these $300,000 plus lots will need to be worth about four times the lot price, or $1.3 million, when completed and there are many existing homes to choose from in this price range. And million+ range represents only 14 percent of the whole market. So about a year’s supply of land remains on the market year after year.
Market conditions like this have never before existed in the 32 years I’ve been in business. Anyone thinking of selling a residence should grab the prices this market will bring while they can.
Everything changes with time and usually before you think it will. And then it’s usually too late.